0.16 release update - RC1 is available

[Justin Ross-2]

Hi, folks. RC1 from revision 1309390 of the 0.16 branch can be got here:

  http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc1/

It includes the following fixes since the beta:

  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3877
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3893
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3896
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3899
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3907
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3920
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3927

RC1 is over two weeks late because I've had another task competing for my time.  It's now closing down, so I have more time to focus on finishing 0.16.  Since the release is late, I'd like to speed up the RC schedule: I'll produce a final release candidate next week (*if*, of course, no major new issues are discovered), and we can begin the voting a week after that.

Thanks for your help testing and preparing 0.16 for release!
Justin

---
0.16 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Robbie Gemmell]

I have tested that the Java client, broker, and management console
bundles on linux. The broker was able to start ok, the management
console was able to connect ok to the broker, and the Hello client
example ran ok againt the broker.

The svn revision hasn't made it through to the properties files used
for version reporting again, and is just showing as '-' like during
the 0.14 RCs. I havent seen this when I have used the release script
and I'd like to stop it happening in future, can I ask what command(s)
you ran to produce the artifacts?

Robbie

On 4 April 2012 22:18, Justin Ross <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi, folks. RC1 from revision 1309390 of the 0.16 branch can be got here:
>
>  http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc1/
>
> It includes the following fixes since the beta:
>
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3877
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3893
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3896
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3899
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3907
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3920
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3927
>
> RC1 is over two weeks late because I've had another task competing for my time.  It's now closing down, so I have more time to focus on finishing 0.16.  Since the release is late, I'd like to speed up the RC schedule: I'll produce a final release candidate next week (*if*, of course, no major new issues are discovered), and we can begin the voting a week after that.
>
> Thanks for your help testing and preparing 0.16 for release!
> Justin
>
> ---
> 0.16 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Justin Ross-2]

Yep, sigh.  Last time I resolved this by running the release script as you
indicated.  I suspect the release.sh invocation under the artifacts target
needs the suggested change.  I'm trying that now.

   (a make snippet)

   artifacts: qpid-${VERSION}
           ./release.sh --all - - ${VERSION}
           # >>>>>> ./release.sh --all - $(shell cat revision) ${VERSION}

   qpid-${VERSION}: revision update-release.sh
           ./release.sh --prepare --svn ${SVN_PATH} \
               $(shell cat revision) ${VERSION}

The full make file is attached.  Thanks for checking again.

justin

On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Robbie Gemmell wrote:

> I have tested that the Java client, broker, and management console
> bundles on linux. The broker was able to start ok, the management
> console was able to connect ok to the broker, and the Hello client
> example ran ok againt the broker.
>
> The svn revision hasn't made it through to the properties files used
> for version reporting again, and is just showing as '-' like during
> the 0.14 RCs. I havent seen this when I have used the release script
> and I'd like to stop it happening in future, can I ask what command(s)
> you ran to produce the artifacts?
>
> Robbie
>
> On 4 April 2012 22:18, Justin Ross <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi, folks. RC1 from revision 1309390 of the 0.16 branch can be got here:
>>
>>  http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc1/
>>
>> It includes the following fixes since the beta:
>>
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3877
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3893
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3896
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3899
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3907
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3920
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3927
>>
>> RC1 is over two weeks late because I've had another task competing for my time.  It's now closing down, so I have more time to focus on finishing 0.16.  Since the release is late, I'd like to speed up the RC schedule: I'll produce a final release candidate next week (*if*, of course, no major new issues are discovered), and we can begin the voting a week after that.
>>
>> Thanks for your help testing and preparing 0.16 for release!
>> Justin
>>
>> ---
>> 0.16 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Justin Ross-2]

I've checked and the suggested fix below has indeed worked in my test
distributions.  RC2 will have this resolved.

Justin

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Justin Ross wrote:

> Yep, sigh.  Last time I resolved this by running the release script as you
> indicated.  I suspect the release.sh invocation under the artifacts target
> needs the suggested change.  I'm trying that now.
>
>  (a make snippet)
>
>  artifacts: qpid-${VERSION}
>          ./release.sh --all - - ${VERSION}
>          # >>>>>> ./release.sh --all - $(shell cat revision) ${VERSION}
>
>  qpid-${VERSION}: revision update-release.sh
>          ./release.sh --prepare --svn ${SVN_PATH} \
>              $(shell cat revision) ${VERSION}
>
> The full make file is attached.  Thanks for checking again.
>
> justin
>
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
>> I have tested that the Java client, broker, and management console
>> bundles on linux. The broker was able to start ok, the management
>> console was able to connect ok to the broker, and the Hello client
>> example ran ok againt the broker.
>>
>> The svn revision hasn't made it through to the properties files used
>> for version reporting again, and is just showing as '-' like during
>> the 0.14 RCs. I havent seen this when I have used the release script
>> and I'd like to stop it happening in future, can I ask what command(s)
>> you ran to produce the artifacts?
>>
>> Robbie
>>
>> On 4 April 2012 22:18, Justin Ross <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Hi, folks. RC1 from revision 1309390 of the 0.16 branch can be got here:
>>>
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc1/
>>>
>>> It includes the following fixes since the beta:
>>>
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3877
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3893
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3896
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3899
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3907
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3920
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3927
>>>
>>> RC1 is over two weeks late because I've had another task competing for my
>>> time.  It's now closing down, so I have more time to focus on finishing
>>> 0.16.  Since the release is late, I'd like to speed up the RC schedule:
>>> I'll produce a final release candidate next week (*if*, of course, no
>>> major new issues are discovered), and we can begin the voting a week after
>>> that.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help testing and preparing 0.16 for release!
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> ---
>>> 0.16 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Cajus Pollmeier-2]

I've tested the build on Debian and found that the python-dev detection
stopped working:

checking for python... /usr/bin/python
checking for python version... 2.7
checking for python platform... linux2
checking for python script directory...
${prefix}/lib/python2.7/site-packages
checking for python extension module directory...
${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.7/site-packages
checking for pkg-config... no
checking for PYTHON... no
configure: WARNING: Couldn't find Python developer libs - you probably
don't have a python-dev or python-devel package installed

Either this relies on pkg-config and the error message is misleading.
python2.7-dev and python-dev are installed.

Any ideas?

Cheers,
Cajus

Am 04.04.2012 23:18, schrieb Justin Ross:

> Hi, folks. RC1 from revision 1309390 of the 0.16 branch can be got
> here:
>
>   http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc1/
>
> It includes the following fixes since the beta:
>
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3877
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3893
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3896
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3899
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3907
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3920
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3927
>
> RC1 is over two weeks late because I've had another task competing
> for my time.  It's now closing down, so I have more time to focus on
> finishing 0.16.  Since the release is late, I'd like to speed up the
> RC schedule: I'll produce a final release candidate next week (*if*,
> of course, no major new issues are discovered), and we can begin the
> voting a week after that.
>
> Thanks for your help testing and preparing 0.16 for release!
> Justin
>
> ---
> 0.16 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Cajus Pollmeier-2]

After adding pkg-config to the list of dependencies, nothing changes.
But it turns out that it queries for the hard coded package named
"python", but it is named "python-2.7" in my case.

Am 11.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Cajus Pollmeier:

> I've tested the build on Debian and found that the python-dev
> detection stopped working:
>
> checking for python... /usr/bin/python
> checking for python version... 2.7
> checking for python platform... linux2
> checking for python script directory...
> ${prefix}/lib/python2.7/site-packages
> checking for python extension module directory...
> ${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.7/site-packages
> checking for pkg-config... no
> checking for PYTHON... no
> configure: WARNING: Couldn't find Python developer libs - you
> probably don't have a python-dev or python-devel package installed
>
> Either this relies on pkg-config and the error message is misleading.
> python2.7-dev and python-dev are installed.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Cheers,
> Cajus
>
> Am 04.04.2012 23:18, schrieb Justin Ross:
>> Hi, folks. RC1 from revision 1309390 of the 0.16 branch can be got
>> here:
>>
>>   http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc1/
>>
>> It includes the following fixes since the beta:
>>
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3877
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3893
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3896
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3899
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3907
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3920
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3927
>>
>> RC1 is over two weeks late because I've had another task competing
>> for my time.  It's now closing down, so I have more time to focus on
>> finishing 0.16.  Since the release is late, I'd like to speed up the
>> RC schedule: I'll produce a final release candidate next week (*if*,
>> of course, no major new issues are discovered), and we can begin the
>> voting a week after that.
>>
>> Thanks for your help testing and preparing 0.16 for release!
>> Justin
>>
>> ---
>> 0.16 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Gordon Sim]

On 04/11/2012 01:33 PM, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> After adding pkg-config to the list of dependencies, nothing changes.
> But it turns out that it queries for the hard coded package named
> "python", but it is named "python-2.7" in my case.

I get the same thing... looks like the problem originates from
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1197326, though I'm not sure
what it was fixing (neither of the two quoted JIRAs seem directly
related, the build improvements one is very general but none of the
contributed patches include these changes).

Andrew, any recollection of what prompted that change?

>
> Am 11.04.2012 12:54, schrieb Cajus Pollmeier:
>> I've tested the build on Debian and found that the python-dev
>> detection stopped working:
>>
>> checking for python... /usr/bin/python
>> checking for python version... 2.7
>> checking for python platform... linux2
>> checking for python script directory...
>> ${prefix}/lib/python2.7/site-packages
>> checking for python extension module directory...
>> ${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.7/site-packages
>> checking for pkg-config... no
>> checking for PYTHON... no
>> configure: WARNING: Couldn't find Python developer libs - you
>> probably don't have a python-dev or python-devel package installed
>>
>> Either this relies on pkg-config and the error message is misleading.
>> python2.7-dev and python-dev are installed.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Cajus
>>
>> Am 04.04.2012 23:18, schrieb Justin Ross:
>>> Hi, folks. RC1 from revision 1309390 of the 0.16 branch can be got here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc1/
>>>
>>> It includes the following fixes since the beta:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3877
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3893
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3896
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3899
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3907
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3920
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3927
>>>
>>> RC1 is over two weeks late because I've had another task competing
>>> for my time. It's now closing down, so I have more time to focus on
>>> finishing 0.16. Since the release is late, I'd like to speed up the
>>> RC schedule: I'll produce a final release candidate next week (*if*,
>>> of course, no major new issues are discovered), and we can begin the
>>> voting a week after that.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help testing and preparing 0.16 for release!
>>> Justin
>>>
>>> ---
>>> 0.16 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Andy Goldstein]

On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:

> On 04/11/2012 01:33 PM, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>> After adding pkg-config to the list of dependencies, nothing changes.
>> But it turns out that it queries for the hard coded package named
>> "python", but it is named "python-2.7" in my case.
>
> I get the same thing... looks like the problem originates from http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1197326, though I'm not sure what it was fixing (neither of the two quoted JIRAs seem directly related, the build improvements one is very general but none of the contributed patches include these changes).

This change also affects RHEL6 (at least for me) - I haven't found anything that supplies pkg-config settings for python for RHEL6.

Andy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Andrew Stitcher]

On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:39 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:

> On 04/11/2012 01:33 PM, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > After adding pkg-config to the list of dependencies, nothing changes.
> > But it turns out that it queries for the hard coded package named
> > "python", but it is named "python-2.7" in my case.
>
> I get the same thing... looks like the problem originates from
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1197326, though I'm not sure
> what it was fixing (neither of the two quoted JIRAs seem directly
> related, the build improvements one is very general but none of the
> contributed patches include these changes).
>
> Andrew, any recollection of what prompted that change?

I think it was an an attempt to significantly tidy up the configure.ac
file that slipped in whilst doing other work on the file.

I've raised QPID-3944 for this issue, and I'll fix it on trunk, if you
think it's a blocker then shout and I'll petition Justin to get it in.

Andrew



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Gordon Sim]

On 04/11/2012 11:09 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:39 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
>> On 04/11/2012 01:33 PM, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>>> After adding pkg-config to the list of dependencies, nothing changes.
>>> But it turns out that it queries for the hard coded package named
>>> "python", but it is named "python-2.7" in my case.
>>
>> I get the same thing... looks like the problem originates from
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1197326, though I'm not sure
>> what it was fixing (neither of the two quoted JIRAs seem directly
>> related, the build improvements one is very general but none of the
>> contributed patches include these changes).
>>
>> Andrew, any recollection of what prompted that change?
>
> I think it was an an attempt to significantly tidy up the configure.ac
> file that slipped in whilst doing other work on the file.
>
> I've raised QPID-3944 for this issue, and I'll fix it on trunk, if you
> think it's a blocker then shout and I'll petition Justin to get it in.

I think its a blocker as it is a regression and effectively prevents
building a (sub-)component on several platforms.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Andrew Stitcher]

Justin,

Can we get QPID-3944 into 0.16?

Andrew

On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 23:16 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:

> On 04/11/2012 11:09 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:39 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
> >> On 04/11/2012 01:33 PM, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> >>> After adding pkg-config to the list of dependencies, nothing changes.
> >>> But it turns out that it queries for the hard coded package named
> >>> "python", but it is named "python-2.7" in my case.
> >>
> >> I get the same thing... looks like the problem originates from
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1197326, though I'm not sure
> >> what it was fixing (neither of the two quoted JIRAs seem directly
> >> related, the build improvements one is very general but none of the
> >> contributed patches include these changes).
> >>
> >> Andrew, any recollection of what prompted that change?
> >
> > I think it was an an attempt to significantly tidy up the configure.ac
> > file that slipped in whilst doing other work on the file.
> >
> > I've raised QPID-3944 for this issue, and I'll fix it on trunk, if you
> > think it's a blocker then shout and I'll petition Justin to get it in.
>
> I think its a blocker as it is a regression and effectively prevents
> building a (sub-)component on several platforms.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Justin Ross-2]

I think this is worth doing for 0.16.  Andy and Gordon, does the trunk
change test out in your environments?

Justin

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Andrew Stitcher wrote:

> Justin,
>
> Can we get QPID-3944 into 0.16?
>
> Andrew
>
> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 23:16 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
>> On 04/11/2012 11:09 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:39 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
>>>> On 04/11/2012 01:33 PM, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>>>>> After adding pkg-config to the list of dependencies, nothing changes.
>>>>> But it turns out that it queries for the hard coded package named
>>>>> "python", but it is named "python-2.7" in my case.
>>>>
>>>> I get the same thing... looks like the problem originates from
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1197326, though I'm not sure
>>>> what it was fixing (neither of the two quoted JIRAs seem directly
>>>> related, the build improvements one is very general but none of the
>>>> contributed patches include these changes).
>>>>
>>>> Andrew, any recollection of what prompted that change?
>>>
>>> I think it was an an attempt to significantly tidy up the configure.ac
>>> file that slipped in whilst doing other work on the file.
>>>
>>> I've raised QPID-3944 for this issue, and I'll fix it on trunk, if you
>>> think it's a blocker then shout and I'll petition Justin to get it in.
>>
>> I think its a blocker as it is a regression and effectively prevents
>> building a (sub-)component on several platforms.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Gordon Sim]

On 04/12/2012 06:30 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
> I think this is worth doing for 0.16.  Andy and Gordon, does the trunk
> change test out in your environments?

Yes, configure picks up my python as before (its essentially reverting a
change) and it then goes on to build the python swig bindings.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

[Andy Goldstein]

I believe this worked for me on RHEL6.

On Apr 12, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Justin Ross wrote:

> I think this is worth doing for 0.16.  Andy and Gordon, does the trunk change test out in your environments?
>
> Justin
>
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
>
>> Justin,
>>
>> Can we get QPID-3944 into 0.16?
>>
>> Andrew

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]