Quantcast

0.16 release update - proposed final RC is available

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

0.16 release update - proposed final RC is available

Justin Ross-2
Hi, folks.  RC3 is available at the link below:

   http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc3/

The following issues have been resolved since RC2:

   jross@nicaea qpid-0.16$ svn log -r 1324656:HEAD | fgrep QPID
   QPID-3944: Autotools build system doesn't correctly detect python
     developer libraries
   QPID-3939 - Bumped wrapped Ruby versions to 0.16.
   QPID-3940 - Back ported to 0.16.
   QPID-3946 - Back-ported to 0.16.
   QPID-3864: add/fix licences in the Java tree for 0.16
   QPID-3962: Added licensing to the Cucumber feature test step definitions

Robbie raised the issue of missing license headers.  All significant code
files have license headers, but some of the build metadata and
documentation does not.  I've created a new jira to fix that for the next
release.  I don't want to hold up 0.16 any longer, and I think we've
dealt with the most important missing headers.

If no new blocker issues are discovered, this will be our final 0.16
release candidate, and the RC3 bits will be the GA bits.  I'll open the
vote for release shortly so we can move toward GA.

One last thing.  I'll be generating the final release notes this week.
Please get any edits you'd like to see into the jira database.

Thanks!
Justin

---
0.16 release page: https://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/016-release.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: 0.16 release update - proposed final RC is available

Darryl L. Pierce
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:55:44AM -0400, Justin Ross wrote:

> Hi, folks.  RC3 is available at the link below:
>
>   http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc3/
>
> The following issues have been resolved since RC2:
>
>   jross@nicaea qpid-0.16$ svn log -r 1324656:HEAD | fgrep QPID
>   QPID-3944: Autotools build system doesn't correctly detect python
>     developer libraries
>   QPID-3939 - Bumped wrapped Ruby versions to 0.16.
>   QPID-3940 - Back ported to 0.16.
>   QPID-3946 - Back-ported to 0.16.
>   QPID-3864: add/fix licences in the Java tree for 0.16
>   QPID-3962: Added licensing to the Cucumber feature test step definitions
>
> Robbie raised the issue of missing license headers.  All significant
> code files have license headers, but some of the build metadata and
> documentation does not.  I've created a new jira to fix that for the
> next release.  I don't want to hold up 0.16 any longer, and I think
> we've dealt with the most important missing headers.
>
> If no new blocker issues are discovered, this will be our final 0.16
> release candidate, and the RC3 bits will be the GA bits.  I'll open
> the vote for release shortly so we can move toward GA.
>
> One last thing.  I'll be generating the final release notes this
> week. Please get any edits you'd like to see into the jira database.
I have a non-blocker that would be a nice-to-have:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3967

It fixes the name of the gemfile, renaming it to qpid-messaging.gem.
This is due to the lack of response from the owner of the current qpid
gemfile on rubygems.org.

--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/


attachment0 (205 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: 0.16 release update - proposed final RC is available

Chug Rolke
0.16-rc3 compiles/runs under windows.

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Darryl L. Pierce" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 10:50:19 AM
> Subject: Re: 0.16 release update - proposed final RC is available
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:55:44AM -0400, Justin Ross wrote:
> > Hi, folks.  RC3 is available at the link below:
> >
> >   http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc3/
> >
> > The following issues have been resolved since RC2:
> >
> >   jross@nicaea qpid-0.16$ svn log -r 1324656:HEAD | fgrep QPID
> >   QPID-3944: Autotools build system doesn't correctly detect python
> >     developer libraries
> >   QPID-3939 - Bumped wrapped Ruby versions to 0.16.
> >   QPID-3940 - Back ported to 0.16.
> >   QPID-3946 - Back-ported to 0.16.
> >   QPID-3864: add/fix licences in the Java tree for 0.16
> >   QPID-3962: Added licensing to the Cucumber feature test step
> >   definitions
> >
> > Robbie raised the issue of missing license headers.  All
> > significant
> > code files have license headers, but some of the build metadata and
> > documentation does not.  I've created a new jira to fix that for
> > the
> > next release.  I don't want to hold up 0.16 any longer, and I think
> > we've dealt with the most important missing headers.
> >
> > If no new blocker issues are discovered, this will be our final
> > 0.16
> > release candidate, and the RC3 bits will be the GA bits.  I'll open
> > the vote for release shortly so we can move toward GA.
> >
> > One last thing.  I'll be generating the final release notes this
> > week. Please get any edits you'd like to see into the jira
> > database.
>
> I have a non-blocker that would be a nice-to-have:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3967
>
> It fixes the name of the gemfile, renaming it to qpid-messaging.gem.
> This is due to the lack of response from the owner of the current
> qpid
> gemfile on rubygems.org.
>
> --
> Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
> Delivering value year after year.
> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
> http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: 0.16 release update - proposed final RC is available

Cajus Pollmeier-2
On Debian Systems it basically compiles/runs. These problems occured:

* Perl tries to install to /usr/usr/lib/foo instead of
%prefix%/usr/lib/foo

   So the Perl-Module fails for me. I've no idea where to configure
   the correct target directory for the build.

* HA test fails

   I've to disable the ha_tests.py, because they make use of the
   qmf python module - which is just present in the build directory
   and not globaly (cyclic build dependency). Maybe it's possible to
   modify sys.path to find the freshly created qmf.console module.

Am 30.04.2012 03:40, schrieb Chuck Rolke:

> 0.16-rc3 compiles/runs under windows.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Darryl L. Pierce" <[hidden email]>
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 10:50:19 AM
>> Subject: Re: 0.16 release update - proposed final RC is available
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:55:44AM -0400, Justin Ross wrote:
>> > Hi, folks.  RC3 is available at the link below:
>> >
>> >   http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.16-rc3/
>> >
>> > The following issues have been resolved since RC2:
>> >
>> >   jross@nicaea qpid-0.16$ svn log -r 1324656:HEAD | fgrep QPID
>> >   QPID-3944: Autotools build system doesn't correctly detect
>> python
>> >     developer libraries
>> >   QPID-3939 - Bumped wrapped Ruby versions to 0.16.
>> >   QPID-3940 - Back ported to 0.16.
>> >   QPID-3946 - Back-ported to 0.16.
>> >   QPID-3864: add/fix licences in the Java tree for 0.16
>> >   QPID-3962: Added licensing to the Cucumber feature test step
>> >   definitions
>> >
>> > Robbie raised the issue of missing license headers.  All
>> > significant
>> > code files have license headers, but some of the build metadata
>> and
>> > documentation does not.  I've created a new jira to fix that for
>> > the
>> > next release.  I don't want to hold up 0.16 any longer, and I
>> think
>> > we've dealt with the most important missing headers.
>> >
>> > If no new blocker issues are discovered, this will be our final
>> > 0.16
>> > release candidate, and the RC3 bits will be the GA bits.  I'll
>> open
>> > the vote for release shortly so we can move toward GA.
>> >
>> > One last thing.  I'll be generating the final release notes this
>> > week. Please get any edits you'd like to see into the jira
>> > database.
>>
>> I have a non-blocker that would be a nice-to-have:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3967
>>
>> It fixes the name of the gemfile, renaming it to qpid-messaging.gem.
>> This is due to the lack of response from the owner of the current
>> qpid
>> gemfile on rubygems.org.
>>
>> --
>> Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
>> Delivering value year after year.
>> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
>> http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: 0.16 release update - proposed final RC is available

Andrew Stitcher
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 15:52 +0200, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> On Debian Systems it basically compiles/runs. These problems occured:
>
> * Perl tries to install to /usr/usr/lib/foo instead of
> %prefix%/usr/lib/foo
>
>    So the Perl-Module fails for me. I've no idea where to configure
>    the correct target directory for the build.

I think you meant %prefix%/lib/foo - what you said is the erroneous
behaviour!




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: 0.16 release update - proposed final RC is available

Cajus Pollmeier-2
Am 03.05.2012 18:21, schrieb Andrew Stitcher:

> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 15:52 +0200, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>> On Debian Systems it basically compiles/runs. These problems
>> occured:
>>
>> * Perl tries to install to /usr/usr/lib/foo instead of
>> %prefix%/usr/lib/foo
>>
>>    So the Perl-Module fails for me. I've no idea where to configure
>>    the correct target directory for the build.
>
> I think you meant %prefix%/lib/foo - what you said is the erroneous
> behaviour!

Yes ;-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: 0.16 release update - proposed final RC is available

Oleksandr Rudyy
In reply to this post by Justin Ross-2
Hi Justin,

I've run some tests against the Java Broker 0-16 RC3 and encountered no issues.

Details of tests run:
used java Drain/Spout examples to publish/receive messages to/from
Java Broker. monitored queues using Java Broker Management Console.

No issues found.

Kind Regards,
Alex

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Loading...